The appeal filed in 1989 was dismissed for want of prosecution as no counsel appeared on behalf of either party on the listed date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 19
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 535 of 1989
Appellant :- Ambika Prasad Respondent :- Ranjana Gupta And Others Counsel for Appellant :- M.B.Singh,S S Chuhan Counsel for Respondent :- K.Nath,R.Nath
Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.
The matter is listed today under the heading that "These Cases Shall Not Be Adjourned".
The appeal is of the year 1989.
None appeared for either of the parties.
In absence of the learned counsel for the appellant, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Consigned to record.
Order Date :- 18.9.2023 Rakesh/-
Digitally signed by :- RAKESH PRAJAPAT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Ambika Prasad
Ranjana Gupta
Jaspreet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
