This Habeas Corpus writ petition rendered infructuous due to the efflux of time. The judgment was heard by a bench of two judges but disposed of as infructuous without substantive reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 67
Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 657 of 2022
Petitioner :- Naeem Khan Respondent :- Union Of India And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amit Kumar Asthana Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,G.A.,Jitendra Kumar
Hon'ble Rahul Chaturvedi,J. Hon'ble Mohd. Azhar Husain Idrisi,J.
Heard Shri Amit Kumar Asthana, learned counsel for petitioner and Shri Jitendra Kumar, learned counsel for Union of India.
On account of efflux of time, this habeas corpus writ petition has rendered infructuous and the same is dismissed as such.
Order Date :- 14.7.2023 M. Kumar
Digitally signed by :- MANISH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Naeem Khan
Union of India
Rahul Chaturvedi
Mohd. Azhar Husain Idrisi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
