Ram Pratap Dubey and 2 Others v. State of U.P.and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition assailing FIR dismissed as infructuous since police charge sheet was submitted. Order lacks reasoning.
Writ petition assailing FIR dismissed as infructuous since police charge sheet was submitted. Order lacks reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:144047-DB
Court No. - 67
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10667 of 2023
Petitioner :- Ram Pratap Dubey And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P.And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rahul Chaturvedi,J. Hon'ble Mohd. Azhar Husain Idrisi,J.
Heard Sri Sanjay Kumar Mishra learned counsel for the petitioners and learned AGA for the State.
By means of the present criminal writ petition, the petitioners are assailing the legality and validity of the FIR dated 07.04.2023 registered as case crime no.40 of 2023, under Sections 498-A, 504, 323, 313, 406 I.P.C. r/w 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Madanapur, District Deoria.
At the very outset, learned A.G.A. submits that after investigation the police has submitted the charge sheet on 23.05.2023 against all the accused persons and therefore, this writ petition has rendered infructuous and is accordingly, dismissed.
Order Date :- 19.7.2023 Jitendra
Digitally signed by :- JITENDRA KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Pratap Dubey And 2 Others
State Of U.P.And 2 Others
Rahul Chaturvedi
Mohd. Azhar Husain Idrisi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court