The AHC at Allahabad listed the habeas corpus petition impersonating. Counsel for petitioner was absent. Upon hearing the Union of India, the court dismissed the petition as infructuous due to the efflux of one year since the impugned order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:231047-DB
Court No. - 67
Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 1073 of 2022
Petitioner :- Suryabhan Yadav Respondent :- Superintendent District Jail District Azamgarh And 3 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,A.S.G.I.,Nand Lal
Hon'ble Rahul Chaturvedi,J. Hon'ble Mohd. Azhar Husain Idrisi,J.
Case called out in the revised list. None appeared on behalf of the petitioner. However, Sri Nand Lal, learned counsel appearing for Union of India is present in the Court.
Learned counsel for the Union of India submits that this Habeas Corpus petition has rendered infructuous on account of efflux of time keeping in view that the order impugned was passed on 03.09.2022 and one year has been lapsed and therefore, this petition has rendered infructuous.
Accordingly, the present petition stands dismissed as infructuous and the same may be consigned to records.
Order Date :- 6.12.2023 Sumit S
Digitally signed by :- SUMIT SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Suryabhan Yadav
Superintendent District Jail District Azamgarh
Union of India
1st Other Respondent
2nd Other Respondent
3rd Other Respondent
Rahul Chaturvedi
Mohd. Azhar Husain Idrisi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
