The court, at the revisionist's request for liberty to withdraw the writ petition, dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:124259
Court No. - 84
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 142 of 2023
Revisionist :- Udit Kumar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Manish Pandey,Priyanka Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J.
1. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the revisionist seeks liberty to withdraw the writ petition.
2. Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(Prashant Kumar, J.)
Order Date :- 5.6.2023 Rama Kant
Digitally signed by :- RAMAKANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Udit Kumar
State Of U.P.
Prashant Kumar
Rama Kant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
