In this Article 226 matter, the petitioner sought liberty to withdraw the petition after arguments. The High Court dismissed the petition on the stated grounds of withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:124266
Court No. - 84
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1056 of 2023
Petitioner :- Kamlendra Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vijay Bahadur Maurya Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J.
2. Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(Prashant Kumar, J.)
Order Date :- 5.6.2023 Rama Kant
Digitally signed by :- RAMAKANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Kamlendra
State Of U.P.
4 Others
Prashant Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
