Sanu v. State of U.P. and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Allahabad High Court dismissed criminal revision No. 602 of 2014 as infructuous because it had ceased to be alive.
What did the court decide?
Criminal revision dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:171518
Court No. - 80
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 602 of 2014
Revisionist :- Sanu Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Anr. Counsel for Revisionist :- Narayan Singh Kushwaha Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Subhash Chandra Sharma,J.
Learned counsel for the revisionist is permitted to correct the section of relevant law in the memo of revision during the course of the day.
Learned counsel for the revisionist submits that this criminal revision has become infructuous and prays that the same may be dismissed as infructuous.
Accordingly, this criminal revision is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 25.8.2023 Ashok Gupta
Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Coram
Hon'ble Subhash Chandra Sharma, J.
Ashok Kumar Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLR/602/2014
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court