Allowed

Juvenile -X v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC24 Aug 2023CRLR/1881/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court allowed criminal revision challenging Juvenile Justice Board and appellate court orders under the Juvenile Justice Act. Bench opined lower courts failed to apply judicial mind on Section 12 provisions. CrRev allowed; orders quashed; juvenile released on bail with conditions.

What did the court decide?

Orders of Juvenile Justice Board dated 03.01.2023 and appellate court dated 03.03.2023 set aside; revision allowed; delinquent released on bail with conditions.

Juvenile -X Vs State of U.P. and Another — Child Custody and Guardianship | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:171846

¶2

Court No. - 80

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1881 of 2023

¶4

Revisionist :- Juvenile -X Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Bhaju Ram Pprasad Sharma,Arvind Kumar Srivastava

¶5

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Pradeep Kumar

¶6

Hon'ble Subhash Chandra Sharma,J.

¶7

Heard learned counsel for the revisionist as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶8

The present criminal revision has been preferred by the revisionist through his father with a prayer to allow this revision and set aside the judgment and order dated 03.03.2023 passed by Child Court/Additional Session Judge, Maharajganj in Criminal Appeal No. 2 of 2023 as well as order dated 03.01.2023 passed by Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Maharajganj. Further prayed to release the revisionist on bail in Case Crime No. 184 of 2022, under Section 376 IPC, Section 5M/6 POCSO Act, Section 3(2) 5 SC/ST Act, Police Station Thoothibari, District Maharajganj.

¶9

It is submitted by learned counsel for the revisionist that in this case the revisionist was aged about 13 years at the time of alleged incident. It is further submitted that he is in child care home since 28.10.2022. It is further submitted that as per allegation in the F.I.R. the victim aged about 7 years was dragged by him in the field of sugarcane and committed rape with her, but during medical examination no any injury either external or internal was found on her person, even no any sign of rape was found on her. It is also submitted that there is nothing such in pathology report to show that rape was committed with her. It is also submitted that there is no material on record to show that the complicity of revisionist in commission of rape. It is further submitted that there is nothing adverse against the interest of the revisionist in the report submitted by D.P.O.

¶10

It is further submitted that the provisions as contained u/s 12 of the Juvenile Justice Act had not been considered by the Juvenile Justice Board even the report submitted by Probation Officer was

¶11

also not considered. The appellate court has also not considered all these facts but rejected the appeal without applying its judicial mind and considering the law as contained u/s 12 of the aforesaid Act. He is in Child Care Home since 28.10.2022 and his psychology is being affected adversely, therefore, requested to set aside orders passed by the J.J. Board as well as appellate court and allow the criminal revision.

¶12

Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer as aforesaid and submits that the orders passed by the learned J.J. Board as well as learned appellate court cannot be said to be unlawful, therefore, he cannot be said to be entitled for bail and revision, being devoid of merit, is liable to be dismissed.

¶13

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submission made by learned counsel for the revisionist as well as learned A.G.A. for the State, the time revisionist remained in Child Care Home, perusal of record, the provisions as contained u/s 12 of Juvenile Justice Act, the report submitted by the Probation Officer, it appears that Juvenile Justice Board as well as the appellate court had not considered the relevant provisions and the material on record in well manner but passed the orders without applying their judicial mind. In this way, there appears ground in this revision and the orders passed by the Juvenile Justice Board as well as learned appellate court are liable to be set aside.

¶14

Accordingly, the orders passed by Juvenile Justice Board dated 03.01.2023 and the appellate court dated 03.03.2023 are, hereby, set aside and present criminal revision is hereby, allowed .

¶15

It is directed that delinquent/applicant be released on bail on executing person bond by the revisionist (father of the delinquent) and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Juvenile Justice Board concerned on following conditions :-

¶16

(i) The revisionist/father will furnish an undertaking that upon release on bail the revisionist will not be permitted to go into contact or association with any known criminal or allowed to be exposed to any moral, physical, or psychological danger and further that the father will ensure that the juvenile will not repeat the offence.

¶17

(ii) The revisionist/father will further furnish an undertaking to the effect that the juvenile will pursue his study at the appropriate level which he would be encouraged to do besides other constructive activities and not be allowed to waste his time in

¶18

unproductive and excessive recreational pursuits.

¶19

(iii) Juvenile and the revisionist/father will report to the Probation Officer on the first Monday of every calendar month.

¶20

(iv) The Probation Officer will keep a strict vigil on the activities of the juvenile and regularly draw up his social investigation report that would be submitted to the Juvenile Justice Board concerned on such a periodical basis as the Juvenile Justice Board may determine.

¶21

Order Date :- 24.8.2023 Vikram

¶22

Digitally signed by :- VIKRAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Juvenile -X v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Juvenile -X v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shashi Bhushan Pandey Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Juvenile X Vs State of U.P. and Another

X(Juvenile) Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Sindhu Devi Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

X- Juvenile Vs State of U.P. and Another

Ajay Kumar Vs State of U.P. and Another