Sanjiv v. State of U P and 4 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner's counsel moved to dismiss the writ petition as infructuous. The High Court accepted this submission and dismissed the petition accordingly.
The petitioner's counsel moved to dismiss the writ petition as infructuous. The High Court accepted this submission and dismissed the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:171859
Court No. - 80
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 3216 of 2021
Petitioner :- Sanjiv Respondent :- State Of U P And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pramod Kumar Singh,Anjali Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Subhash Chandra Sharma,J.
Ms. Anjali, learned counsel for the petitioner states that this writ petition has become infructuous and it may be dismissed as infructuous.
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 25.8.2023 A. Singh
Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Sanjiv
State Of U P
Subhash Chandra Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court