Revisionist requested dismissal of the filed criminal revision petition as withdrawn due to lack of admission and no prima facie illegality raised.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 91
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 5335 of 2022
Revisionist :- Vikas Jaiswal Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mohd. Azhar Husain Idrisi,J.
Heard learned counsel for the revisionist and learned A.G.A. for the State.
Learned counsel for the revisionist submitted that the present revision is not admitted and he does not want to press this revision and it may be dismissed as withdrawn.
Since the revision has not been admitted as yet, besides, prima facie there appears no illegality or perversity in the impugned order has been pointed out by learned counsel for the revisionist.
In view of the above statement, this revision is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order Date :- 1.2.2023 Rmk.
Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohd. Azhar Husain Idrisi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
