Writ petition seeking quashment of externment order dismissed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad as infructuous and non-prosecuted by the petitioner in view of the expiry of the externment period.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous and in non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 91
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5995 of 2022
Petitioner :- Shokeen Respondent :- State Of U.P., Through Its Home Secretary U.P. Counsel for Petitioner :- Atul Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mohd. Azhar Husain Idrisi,J.
Case called out. Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
Heard and perused the record.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that externment period has been over, therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous and he do not want to prosecute it further more. Hence, it may be dismissed as infructuous.
In view of the statement so made by learned counsel for the petitioner, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous and in non prosecution.
Order Date :- 6.2.2023
Israr
Digitally signed by :- ISRAR AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Shokeen
State Of U.P.
Mohd. Azhar Husain Idrisi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
