Pawan v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Revision dismissed as withdrawn by the revisionist who failed to comply with a conditional order.
What did the court decide?
Interim order dated 07.12.2022 vacated; revision dismissed.
What the court decided
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 3507 of 2022
Revisionist :- Pawan Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Ankit Agarval Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Umesh Chandra Sharma,J.
Heard Sri Ankit Agarval, learned counsel for the revisionist, Sri Pankaj Kumar Tripathi, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
Learned counsel for the revisionist informed that the revisionist could not fulfilled the conditional order passed by this Court on 07.12.2022. He further states that he has instructions from his client to withdraw this revision.
In view of above, this revision is dismissed as withdrawn.
The interim order dated 07.12.2022 stands vacated.
Order Date :- 4.1.2023 Shahroz
Digitally signed by :- SHAHROJ ALAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Pawan
- respondent
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
Coram
Umesh Chandra Sharma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLR/3507/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court