Disposed

Gulab Pandey v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC4 Jan 2023A482/38852/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Applicant relinquished quashing prayer opting for bail under Satendra Kumar Antil guidelines. Court directed that if bail application is filed within four weeks, it shall be disposed of per said guidelines. No coercive action allowed during this period.

What did the court decide?

No coercive action for four weeks; applicant must file bail application within this period for consideration under Satendra Kumar Antil guidelines.

Gulab Pandey Vs State of U.P. and Another — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Court No. - 72

¶2

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 38852 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Gulab Pandey Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Yogendra Misra,Niraj Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Umesh Chandra Sharma,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶6

This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing the summoning order dated 27.10.2021 passed by learned Additional Civil Judge (S.D.), Jaunpur and charge-sheet dated 19.05.2021 in Criminal Case No.39 of 2020 (State Vs. Rita Pandey and others) arising out of Case Crime No.379 of 2019, under section 323, 504, 506, 307, 324, 325 I.P.C., Police Station Badalapur, District Jaunpur, pending in the Court of Additional Civil Judge (S.D.) NC-III, Jaunpur.

¶7

At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant relinquishes the prayer for quashment and wish to move bail application before the trial court in view of the guidelines / observations given by Hon'ble The Apex Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in ( 2021) 10 SCC 773 .

¶8

Learned A.G.A. has no objection.

¶9

Considering the above submissions and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, it is provided that in case the applicant appears before the court concerned within four weeks from today and moves application for bail, the same shall be considered and disposed of in terms of the guidelines / observations given by Hon'ble The Apex Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in ( 2021) 10 SCC 773 .

¶10

For a period of four weeks from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant.

¶11

It is made clear that in the event, no such application is moved within the time prescribed above, this order will be of no avail to the applicant.

¶12

With the above direction, the instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is finally disposed of

¶13

Order Date :- 4.1.2023 Pravesh

¶14

Digitally signed by :- PRAVESH KUMAR MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Gulab Pandey v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gulab Pandey v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pankaj Singh Vs State of U.P. and Another

Devi Shankar Mishra Vs State of U.P.

Manjeet and 4 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Munna Lal Vs State of U.P. and Another

Mahboob Alam @ Sajju Vs State of U.P. and Another

Pawan Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others