Mustak Ahmad v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged quashing of an FIR dated 11.10.2022 under the Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The High Court held that the petition was misconceived as allegations disclosed cognizable offences and denied inspection of defences.
What did the court decide?
Petition to quash the FIR dated 11.10.2022 was rejected without prejudice to the right to apply for bail or anticipatory bail.