The High Court at Allahabad dismissed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition by the petitioner as infructuous on the grounds that he had already been arrested, rendering the relief sought unnecessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:107302-DB
Court No. - 46
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4172 of 2023
Petitioner :- Shailesh Srivastava Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Upendra Singh,Raghavendra Singh,Suvarna Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Anjani Kumar Mishra,J. Hon'ble Ms. Nand Prabha Shukla,J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has already been arrested, therefore, the writ petition has been rendered infructuous.
In view of the statement made, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 17.5.2023 Aditya Tripathi
Digitally signed by :- ADITYA TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Shailesh Srivastava
State Of U.P.
2 Others
Anjani Kumar Mishra
Nand Prabha Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
