Gulfam v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
This single-line order dismissed the writ petition as infructuous because the charge-sheet had been filed, rendering the cause for filing the petition no more surviving.
This single-line order dismissed the writ petition as infructuous because the charge-sheet had been filed, rendering the cause for filing the petition no more surviving.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:216573-DB
Court No. - 45
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 16748 of 2023
Petitioner :- Gulfam Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Abhishek Kumar Yadav,Kamal Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Birla,J. Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J.
Order Date :- 9.11.2023 Pkb/
Digitally signed by :- PRAMOD KUMAR BAJPAI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Gulfam
State Of U.P.
3 Others
Vivek Kumar Birla
Vinod Diwakar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court