This court dismissed the criminal miscellaneous writ petition as it had become infructuous, directing reference to a concurrent order.
Impugned petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:214831-DB
Court No. - 45
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8216 of 2023
Petitioner :- Pallaw Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Irshad Ahmad,Bharat Dixit Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Kaif Mohammad,Lalit Kumar Misra,Santosh Kumar Tripathi,Udai Chandani
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Birla,J. Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J.
Order Date :- 8.11.2023 Abhishek
Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Pallaw
State of U.P.
2 Others
Vivek Kumar Birla
Vinod Diwakar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
