In this criminal miscellaneous writ petition, the court was asked to quash an FIR alleging cheating and criminal breach of trust. The High Court found the petition lacked merit and applied the guidelines of Bhajan Lal to dismiss the plea for quashing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:214523-DB
Court No. - 45
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10397 of 2023
Petitioner :- Dharm Singh @ Dheeraj Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sonu Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Birla,J. Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J.
which discloses cognizable offence and submits that initially First Information Report was lodged under Sections 406, 420 IPC, whereas during investigation sections 467, 468, 471 IPC have been added.
Order Date :- 8.11.2023 Lalit Shukla
Digitally signed by :- LALIT KUMAR SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the impugned First Information Report requires quashing under the Criminal Procedure Code vide the present petition.
Whether allegation of counterblast petition and settlement of prior dispute warrants interference with the FIR.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
State of Haryana and others vs. Bhajan Lal and othersApplied¶13
State of Haryana and others vs. Bhajan Lal and others, 1992 Supp. (1) SCC 335 · Who else cites this
Dharm Singh @ Dheeraj
State Of U.P.
2 Others
Vivek Kumar Birla
Vinod Diwakar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
