The High Court dismissed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition filed by the petitioner for want of prosecution, noting the petitioner's absence despite being taken up in the revised list.
Petitioner's application dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:191326-DB
Court No. - 46
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 12669 of 2023
Petitioner :- Mohd Rizwan Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Irshad Ahmad Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Rakesh Kumar Verma,Ravindra Sharma
Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J. Hon'ble Syed Aftab Husain Rizvi,J.
None appears for the petitioner, even when the matter is taken up in the revised list.
We have perused the F.I.R., which otherwise prima facie discloses commissioning of cognizable offence in the matter. Learned A.G.A. also points out that the petitioner has criminal history of two cases, which are not explained.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 5.10.2023 MN/-
Digitally signed by :- MAHENDRA NATH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohd Rizwan
State Of U.P.
Ashwani Kumar Mishra
Syed Aftab Husain Rizvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
