Prem Prakash @ Pinku v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court held that a criminal appeal filed by an appellant who died in January 2023 abated as no application to continue the appeal by a near relative was filed.
The High Court held that a criminal appeal filed by an appellant who died in January 2023 abated as no application to continue the appeal by a near relative was filed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 48
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 3340 of 2009
Appellant :- Prem Prakash @ Pinku Respondent :- State of U.P. Counsel for Appellant :- Apul Misra,Kuldeep Singh,P.N. Misra,S.D. Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.
As per the office report dated 5.4.2023 which is based on the report of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bareilly dated 14.3.2023, we find that the appellant Prem Prakash @ Pinku has died in the month of January 2023. We also find that no application by any near relative has been filed for continuing the appeal.
Under such circumstances, the appeal abates.
Office to proceed accordingly.
Order Date :- 21.4.2023 GS
(Manish Kumar Nigam, J.) (Siddhartha Varma, J.)
Digitally signed by :- GAUTAM SONI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Prem Prakash @ Pinku
State of U.P.
Siddhartha Varma
Manish Kumar Nigam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court