The Criminal Misc. Writ Petition was set down for hearing but the petitioner expressed no desire to press the petition. The learned judges observed that the petition was dismissed as withdrawn without any further orders or substantive discussion.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:99170-DB
Court No. - 48
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4205 of 2023
Petitioner :- Sushil Gupta Respondent :- State Of Uttar Pradesh And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sudhir Kumar Agarwal Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Anil Kumar Mehrotra,Srijan Mehrotra
Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.
Shri Sudhir Kumar Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to press this petition and therefore, petition may be dismissed as withdrawn.
Learned A.G.A. does not have any objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner.
Accordingly, the writ the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order Date :- 8.5.2023 M.S. Ansari
(Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.)
Digitally signed by :- MOHD SAQIB ANSARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Sushil Gupta
State Of Uttar Pradesh
Manish Kumar Nigam
Siddhartha Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
