This order dismisses a civil miscellaneous review application and a delay condonation application filed by Nathu Ram against the Board of Revenue. The court rejected the delay condonation due to inadequate explanation and held no grounds for review were made out.
Both the review application and the delay condonation application are dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:202322
Court No. - 32
Case :- CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION No. - 243 of 2023
Applicant :- Nathu Ram Opposite Party :- Board Of Revenue And 5 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Sanjay Kr. Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- C.S.C.,Achal Singh
Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J.
(In re : Civil Misc. Delay Condonation Application and Review Application)
Heard Shri Sanjay Kumar Srivastava, counsel for the applicant and Sri Achal Singh, Advocate, representing the Gaon Sabha.
The ofÏce note indicates that review application is beyond time by 1181 days and the afÏdavit filed in support of the delay condonation application does not satisfactorily explain the delay in filing the review application.
I have also considered the review application on merits.
No grounds for review are made out.
For both the aforesaid reasons, the review application and the delay condonation application stand dismissed.
Order Date :- 18.10.2023 Anurag/-
Digitally signed by :- ANURAG KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Nathu Ram
Salil Kumar Rai
Anurag Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
