Partly allowed

Ashok Nishad v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC7 Jul 2023BAIL/58267/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge of the Allahabad High Court disposed of a bail application. The court proposed remand for interrogation but stayed bail pending judicial review. The respondent petition argued bias and relevant connection, but the court ordered remand on 19.11.2022 and recommended judicial review.

What did the court decide?

Applicant granted bail and remanded to police custody on 19.11.2022; case remanded for judicial review thereof.

Ashok Nishad Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:134670

¶2

Court No. - 68

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 58267 of 2022

¶4

Applicant :- Ashok Nishad Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rajeev Chaddha,Kartikeya Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Km. Anjana

¶5

Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶6

orZeku nkf.Md izdh.kZ vfxze tekur izkFkZuk i=] vkosnd v’kksd fu"kkn dh vksj ls eq0v0la0 356 lu 2022] vUrxZr /kkjk 376] 504] 506] 406 Hkk0na0fo0] Fkkuk pkSjh pkSjk] ftyk xksj[kiqj esa tekur ij eqDr djus gsrq izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA

¶7

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk] ifjoknh ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA

¶8

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk us rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd vkosnd dks bl izdj.k esa jaft’ku >wBk QWlk;k x;k gS] mlus dfFkr vijk/k dkfjr ugha fd;k gS] vkosnd ds ?kjokys vkosnd dh 'kknh ihfM+rk ds lkFk djus ds fy, drbZ rS;kj ugha Fks vkSj mUgksaus bl ckjs esa ihfM+rk ds ?kjokyksa ls dHkh dksbZ ckrphr ugha dh] vkosnd }kjk ihfM+rk ds ?kjokyksa ls dHkh dksbZ iSlk ugha fy;k x;k] vkosnd ds fo:) yxk, x, lHkh vkjksi ljklj vlR; ,oa diksydfYir gSa] vkosnd funksZ"k gS rFkk og bl izdj.k esa fn0 19&11&2022 ls dkjkxkj es a fu:) gS] blfy, vkosnd dks tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;] tekur ij eqDr gksus ds i’pkr~ vkosnd U;k;ky; }kjk fufnZ"V 'krksZ ,oa vkns’kks a dk vuqikyu djsxkA

¶9

ifjoknh ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk us vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ds rdksZ dk izcy fojks/k djrs gq, rdZ i z Lrqr fd;k fd vkosnd us ihfM+rk dks 'kknh dk >kalk nsdj mlds lkFk 'kkjhfjd laca/k cuk;k] vkosnd us okfnuh ds ukuk ls rhu yk[k :i, Hkh Bx fy,] ihfM+rk ds /kkjk 161 ,oa 164 na0iz0la0 ds c;ku esa 'kknh dk >kalk nsdj 'kkjhfjd laca/k cuk, tkus dh ckr dgh x;h gS] vkosnd@vfHk;qDr }kjk dkfjr vijk/k laKs; ,oa xEHkhj izd`fr dk gS] blfy, vkosnd dks tekur ij u NksM+k tk;A

¶10

fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk ds rdksZ ds ifjisz{; esa i=koyh ij miyC/k lk{;ksa ds vk/kkj ij vkosnd dks tekur ij eqDr fd, tkus dk dksbZ vkSfpR; ugha gS rFkk ;g tekur vkosnu i= fujLr fd, tkus ;ksX; gSA

¶11

rn~uqlkj okn ds xq.k nks"k ij fcuk dksbZ fVIi.kh fd, gq,] vkosnd dk tekur vkosnu i= fujLr fd;k tkrk gSA fn0 % 7&7&2023 ds0lh0flag

¶12

Digitally signed by :- KAILASH CHANDRA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Ashok Nishad v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashok Nishad v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Rubi Vs State of U.P.

Robin Vs State of U.P.

Neelu Vs State of U.P.

Sonu Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Bhagwan Singh @ Kala Vs State of U.P.

Sandeep Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others