Smt. Rubi v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court granted bail to the applicant in a criminal appeal as she is the accused, has no financial means, and cannot provide bail bonds. The application was allowed.
What did the court decide?
Bail granted on personal bond to the applicant with conditions to attend trial and not facilitate tampering of evidence.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:133842
Court No. - 68
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 53065 of 2022
Applicant :- Smt. Rubi Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Ramesh Kumar Pandey,Vivek Kumar Maheshwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Akash Tomar
Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.
orZeku nkf.Md izdh.kZ tekur izkFkZuk i=] vkosfndk Jherh :ch dh vksj ls eq0v0la0 70 lu 2022] vUrxZr /kkjk 304&ch Hkk0na0fo0] Fkkuk ckcjh] ftyk 'kkeyh esa tekur ij eqDr djus gsrq izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA vkosfndk ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu
fd;kA
vkosfndk ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd vkosfndk dks bl izdj.k esa xyr ,oa QthZ rjhds ls >wBk QWlk;k x;k gS] mlus dfFkr vijk/k dkfjr ugha fd;k gS] vkosfndk erdk dh tsBkuh gS] mlus erdk ls dHkh vfrfjDr ngst dh ekWx ugha dh vkSj u gh blds fy, mls izrkfM+r fd;k D;ksafd vkosfndk dks ml ngst ls dksbZ ykHk feyus okyk ugha Fkk] e`rdk us fdlh vU; ckr ls {kqC/k gksdj Lo;a dksbZ tgjhyh oLrq [kkdj vkRegR;k fd;k gS] vkosfndk us ,slk dqN ugha fd;k gS] vkosfndk funksZ"k gS rFkk og bl izdj.k esa 6&10&2022 ls dkjkxkj es a fu:) gS] blfy, vkosfndk dks tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;A
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant deserves bail considering her role in the case and financial status.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Smt. Rubi
Coram
Gautam Chowdhary
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/53065/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court