Allowed

Robin v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC6 Jul 2023BAIL/53524/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the bail application of Robin, who was accused of offences under Sections 304 and 308 IPC. The Court, without expressing an opinion on merits, observed that the applicant made out a case for bail. He was released on furnishing a personal bond and two heavy local sureties subject to standard bail conditions.

What did the court decide?

Order to release the applicant on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two heavy local sureties.

Robin Vs State of U.P. — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:133954

¶2

Court No. - 68

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 53524 of 2022

¶4

Applicant :- Robin Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Pawan Singh Pundir,Anjali Singh Tomer,Harikrishna Rajesh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Chandra Shekhar Kushwaha

¶5

Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record.

¶7

It has been argued by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. Learned counsel further submits that by the efflux of time, trial began and during the trial, the statement of first informant was recorded as P.W.1 and was declared hostile by the learned trial Court, copy of statement is annexed as Annexure-SA1 to the supplementary affidavit, which has been filed today in the Court and is taken on record. He thus submits that no offence against the applicant is made out. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused have also been mentioned. It has also been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required and is also ready to accept all the conditions which the Court may deem fit to impose

¶8

upon him. He next submits that applicant is languishing in jail since 10.05.2022, having no criminal history.

¶9

Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant by contending that the innocence of the applicant cannot be adjudged at pre trial stage, therefore, he does not deserve any indulgence.

¶10

Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties, nature of evidence, and all attending facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, this Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. Hence the bail application is allowed.

¶11

Let applicant Robin involved in Case Crime No.70 of 2022 under Sections 304, 308 I.P.C., Police Station Ratanpuri, District Muzaffar Nagar, be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two heavy local sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following conditions:-

¶12

A. The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence during the trial.

¶13

B. The applicant shall not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.

¶14

C. The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.

¶15

D. The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is an accused, or suspected, of the commission of he is suspected.

¶16

E. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the

¶17

facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶18

In case of breach of any of the above condition, the trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the applicant in accordance with law.

¶19

Order Date :- 6.7.2023 S.Ali

¶20

Digitally signed by :- SHAUKAT ALI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Robin v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Robin v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Deshraj Vs State of U.P.

Wahab Ashrsf Vs State of U.P.

Gaurav Vs State of U.P.Nad 3 Others

Smt. Rubi Vs State of U.P.

Neelu Vs State of U.P.

Savej Vs State of U.P.