This judgment withdraws an anticipatory bail application dated 2019 as infructuous because the applicant's counsel submitted that it was no longer needed.
Application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:184574
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 57045 of 2019
Applicant :- Smt. Lajja Rani And 8 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rajendra Kumar Pandey,Ashutosh Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
Order Date :- 22.9.2023 Vikas
[Krishan Pahal, J.]
Digitally signed by :- VIKAS VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present anticipatory bail application has become infructuous.
Smt. Lajja Rani And 8 Others
State of U.P.
Krishan Pahal
Vikas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
