Ghaseeta v. State of U.P. and Anothers
Case brief
What is this about?
In this criminal miscellaneous bail application, the judge dismissed the petition as infructuous following counsel's submission that the applicant had expired.
In this criminal miscellaneous bail application, the judge dismissed the petition as infructuous following counsel's submission that the applicant had expired.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:182965
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 53184 of 2019
Applicant :- Ghaseeta Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Anothers Counsel for Applicant :- Zafeer Ahmad Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
Order Date :- 21.9.2023 Ravi Kant
(Krishan Pahal, J.)
Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application is maintainable when the applicant has expired.
Ghaseeta
Krishan Pahal
Ravi Kant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court