Disposed

Satyendra Mishra v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC22 Sept 2023ABAIL/9009/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court disposed of an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 CrPC. An anticipatory bail application has been filed by the applicant for protection in regard to a crime under Section 420 IPC. The Court has disposed of the present anticipatory bail application with a direction that the applicant will surrender before the concerned court within four weeks from today and in case a regular

What did the court decide?

Disposed of the application with direction to surrender within four weeks and liberty to file regular bail application decided per Satender Kumar Antil.

Satyendra Mishra Vs State of U.P. and Another — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:183719

¶2

Court No. - 72

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 9009 of 2023

¶4

Applicant :- Satyendra Mishra Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Gagan Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.

¶6

List has been revised.

¶7

Heard Sri Gagan Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Pankaj Kumar, learned A.G.A. for the State and also perused the record.

¶8

The present application for anticipatory bail has been filed for protection in regard to FIR/Case Crime No. 555 of 2015, under Section 420 I.P.C., P.S.New Agra, District- Agra.

¶9

After arguing for some time, applicant's counsel submits that the present application for anticipatory bail may be disposed of with liberty to file a regular bail application which may be decided keeping in view the guidelines as laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another , reported in 2022 SCC Online SC 825 .

¶10

Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the applicant.

¶11

After hearing learned counsel for the parties, no case is made out for interference u/s 438 Cr.P.C.. The present anticipatory bail application is disposed of with the direction that the applicant shall surrender before the court concerned within four weeks from today and in case, a regular bail application is filed, the same be decided in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra) .

¶12

For the period of four weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant before the court concerned, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant, in the above case.

¶13

(Justice Krishan Pahal)

¶14

Order Date :- 22.9.2023 Siddhant

¶15

Digitally signed by :- SIDDHANT SAHU High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Satyendra Mishra v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satyendra Mishra v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ghaseeta Vs State of U.P. and Anothers

Shahjad @ Shahjad Khan Vs State of U.P. and Another

Krishnapal @ K.P. Vs State of U.P.

Smt. Lajja Rani and 8 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Lokesh Pandit Vs State of U.P. and Another

Sakir Vs State of U.P.