This court dismissed an anticipatory bail application filed in 2019 as infructuous due to excessive delay, noting the applicant did not appear for recent hearings. The court cited statutory limits and precedents discouraging routine adjournments.
Application dismissed as infructuous; interim protection vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:189400
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 52298 of 2019
Applicant :- Mohd Yameen Khan Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ashutosh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
Order Date :- 3.10.2023 Ravi Kant
(Krishan Pahal, J.)
Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application filed in 2019 is infructuous due to prolonged pendency and lack of appearance by the applicant.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and anotherReferred¶8
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, 2022 SCC Online SC 825 · Who else cites this
Ishwarlal Mali Rathod v. GopalReferred¶9
Ishwarlal Mali Rathod v. Gopal, (2021) 12 SCC 612 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mohd Yameen Khan
Krishan Pahal
Ravi Kant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
