The Court dismissed an anticipatory bail application as infructuous due to its long pendency without the applicant's presence for over three years, citing statutory timelines and judicial precedents against habitual delays.
Application dismissed as infructuous; interim protection vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:188176
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 50630 of 2019
Applicant :- Tanzeemurrahman Alias Tanjim Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rajnish Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
(Justice Krishan Pahal)
Order Date :- 27.9.2023 Shalini
Digitally signed by :- SHALINI JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the long-pending anticipatory bail application should be allowed given the applicant's absence and delay.
Whether the application rendered infructuous by the efflux of time necessitating its dismissal.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and anotherFollowed¶8
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, 2022 SCC Online SC 825 · Who else cites this
Ishwarlal Mali Rathod v. GopalApplied¶8
Ishwarlal Mali Rathod v. Gopal, (2021) 12 SCC 612 · Who else cites this
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Tanzeemurrahman Alias Tanjim
Krishan Pahal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
