The High Court dismissed an anticipatory bail application filed in 2019 as infructuous due to significant delay and lack of appearance by the applicant, citing statutory time limits and judicial precedents against mechanical delays.
The anticipatory bail application was dismissed as infructuous. Any interim protection granted stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:189389
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 50656 of 2019
Applicant :- Kailash Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sanjay Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
Order Date :- 3.10.2023 Ravi Kant
(Krishan Pahal, J.)
Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the long-pending anticipatory bail application can be allowed given the delay and non-appearance.
Whether the anticipatory bail application has been rendered infructuous by the efflux of time.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil vs. CBI and anotherApplied¶8
_Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another_, reported in _2022 SCC Online SC 825_
Ishwarlal Mali Rathod v. GopalApplied¶9
_Ishwarlal Mali Rathod v. Gopal, (2021) 12 SCC 612_ · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kailash
Krishan Pahal
Ravi Kant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Krishan Pahal and Ravi Kant
Parties & counsel
