The High Court dismissed an anticipatory bail application filed in 2019 as infructuous due to significant delay and non-appearance by the applicant over multiple dates, rendering the interim protection vacated.
Application dismissed as infructuous; interim protection, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:164326
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 51489 of 2019
Applicant :- Waseem And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Keshari Nath Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
(Justice Krishan Pahal)
Order Date :- 16.8.2023 Siddhant
Digitally signed by :- SIDDHANT SAHU High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether an anticipatory bail application pending for several years should be disposed of as infructuous.
Whether the delay in hearing the anticipatory bail application violates the statutory time limits.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and anotherExplained¶8
2022 SCC Online SC 825 · Who else cites this
Ishwarlal Mali Rathod v. GopalExplained¶8
(2021) 12 SCC 612 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Waseem And Another
Krishan Pahal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
