Manoj Nigam v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicant failed to appear on the listed date without seeking an adjournment.
What did the court decide?
Bail application dismissed for want of prosecution.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:181767
Court No. - 64
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 46502 of 2018
Applicant :- Manoj Nigam Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rahul Rathi,Ashok Kumar Upadhyay,Ashvani Tripathi,Manoj Kumar Mishra,Niraj Kumar Singh,Yogesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Alok Kumar Gupta
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
- List revised.
- This case is listed peremptorily today.
- No one responds on behalf of the applicant, like on earlier date fixed.
- It is not known whether the trial has been concluded or not.
- There is no request for adjournment of this case too.
- This bail application, is accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the bail application should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of the applicant?
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Manoj Nigam
Coram
Siddharth
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/46502/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court