Dismissed
Raju v. State of U.P.
Allahabad HCBAIL/3727/2020
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Bail application dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicant failed to appear despite being listed peremptorily.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:181745
¶2
Court No. - 64
¶3
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 3727 of 2020
¶4
Applicant :- Raju Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Manoj Kumar Srivastava,Anil Kumar Srivastava (Senior Adv.),Ram Bahadur Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
¶5
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
¶6
- List revised.
¶7
- This case is listed peremptorily today.
¶8
- No one responds on behalf of the applicant, like on earlier date fixed.
¶9
- It is not known whether the trial has been concluded or not.
¶10
- There is no request for adjournment of this case too.
¶11
- This bail application, is accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Raju
Coram
AI extract
Siddharth
Abhishek
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/3727/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court