Dismissed
Pappu v. State of U.P.
Allahabad HCBAIL/2747/2019
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
This bail application was dismissed for lack of prosecution when the applicant's counsel failed to appear or respond on the listed date without seeking an adjournment.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:180618
¶2
Court No. - 64
¶3
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2747 of 2019
¶4
Applicant :- Pappu Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Usha Srivastava,Arjit Srivastava,Vinod Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
¶5
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
¶6
- List revised.
¶7
- This case is listed peremptorily today.
¶8
- No one responds on behalf of the applicant, like on earlier date fixed.
¶9
- It is not known whether the trial has been concluded or not.
¶10
- There is no request for adjournment of this case too.
¶11
- This bail application, is accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Pappu
Coram
AI extract
Siddharth
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/2747/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court