Ram Ratan v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The applicant failed to appear on three consecutive dates. The court dismissed the bail application for want of prosecution without prejudice to filing a fresh application.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:109843
Court No. - 43
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 31226 of 2016
Applicant :- Ram Ratan Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rupesh Srivastav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J.
- Case called out in the revised list. None has appeared on behalf of applicant.
- Perusal of order-sheet reveals that on previous three dates, none has appeared on behalf of applicant. It appears that the applicant is not interested in pursuing the bail application.
- Accordingly, the application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
- This order will not preclude the applicant to file fresh application.
Order Date :- 16.5.2023 Shafique
Digitally signed by :- SAFIKUR RAHAMAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Ram Ratan
Coram
Vinod Diwakar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/31226/2016
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court