This court allowed a bail application under sections 380 and 411 IPC. The applicant was convicted based on a confessional statement and recovery not compliant with Section 100 Cr.P.C. Bail was granted subject to a bond and sureties.
Applicant released on bail with a personal bond and two sureties of Rs.25,000 each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:158221
Court No. - 75
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 26900 of 2023
Applicant :- Rashid Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Mohd. Shahibe Alam Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and
(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
Order Date :- 7.8.2023 VNP/-
Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail is appropriate when the accused is implicated solely on a confessional statement and recovery not in conformity with Section 100 Cr.P.C.
Whether the applicant must execute a bond and furnish sureties as conditions of bail.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rashid
Pankaj Bhatia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
