Allowed

Vineet v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC4 Aug 2023BAIL/22825/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order allows a bail application filed by Vineet under the U.P. Gangsters (Prevention) Act, 1986. The court released the applicant on personal bond with two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each, without expressing an opinion on the merits but citing prior bail enlargement in similar cases.

What did the court decide?

Release of the applicant on bail on personal bond with two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each.

Vineet Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:156746

¶2

Court No. - 75

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 22825 of 2023

¶4

Applicant :- Vineet Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Pawan Singh Pundir,Adarsh Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶6

1. Heard learned Counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

¶7

2. Submission of Counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is on bail in four cases shown in the gang chart. The copies of the bail orders are on record. The applicant is in custody since 20.08.2022.

¶8

3. Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant.

¶9

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and also perusing the material on record, and keeping in view the fact that the applicant has already been enlarged on bail in the aforementioned cases shown in the gang chart and without expressing any opinion on merit of the case, I am of view that the applicant is entitled for bail.

¶10

5. Thus, the present application is allowed .

¶11

6. Let the applicant Vineet be released on bail in Case Crime/ FIR No. 261 of 2022, under Section 2/3 of the U.P. Gangsters and AntiSocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 registered at Police Station Shahpur, District Muzaffarnagar, on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions:

¶12

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

¶13

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

¶14

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶15

Order Date :- 4.8.2023 S.A.

¶16

Digitally signed by :- SALMAN AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Vineet v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vineet v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chandrabhan Vs State of U.P.

Nem Singh Vs State of U.P. and Another

Provincial Rakshak Dal Employees Welfare Association and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Shahwar Vs State of U.P.

Shanu Ali Vs State of U.P.

Ajay Kumar Vs State of U.P.