Disposed

Shyam Sharan Singh v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC25 Sept 2023ABAIL/9562/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court disposed of the anticipatory bail application without granting interim relief, directing the applicant to file a regular bail application within one month and to surrender to the concerned court. Coercive action was stayed during the one-month period.

What did the court decide?

Application disposed with direction to file regular bail application within one month and surrender; coercive action stayed for one month or till surrender.

Shyam Sharan Singh Vs State of U.P. — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:184903

¶2

Court No. - 72

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 9562 of 2023

¶4

Applicant :- Shyam Sharan Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rakesh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Ajay Kumar Sharma

¶5

Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.

¶6

List has been revised.

¶7

Heard Sri Rakesh Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Ajay Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for the informant as well as Sri Sunil Kumar, learned A.G.A. for the State and also perused the record.

¶8

The present application for anticipatory bail has been filed for protection in regard to FIR/Case Crime No. 95 of 2023, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506 I.P.C., P.S.- Baragaon, District- Saharanpur.

¶9

After arguing for some time, applicant's counsel submits that the present application for anticipatory bail may be disposed of with a direction to file a regular bail application which may be decided keeping in view the guidelines as laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another , reported in 2022 SCC Online SC 825 .

¶10

Learned A.G.A. and learned counsel for the informant have no objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the applicant.

¶11

After hearing learned counsel for the parties, no case is made out for interference u/s 438 Cr.P.C. The present anticipatory bail application is disposed of with a direction that the applicant shall surrender before the concerned court within one month from today and in case, a regular bail application is filed, the same be decided in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra) .

¶12

For the period of one month from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant before the concerned court, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant, in the above case.

¶13

(Justice Krishan Pahal)

¶14

Order Date :- 25.9.2023 Shalini

¶15

Digitally signed by :- SHALINI JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Shyam Sharan Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shyam Sharan Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Lajja Rani and 8 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Satyendra Mishra Vs State of U.P. and Another

Lokesh Pandit Vs State of U.P. and Another

Sambhu Jaiswal and Another Vs State of U.P.

Arun Kumar Shukla Vs State of U.P. and Another

Furkaan Ansari Vs State of U.P.