Disposed

Gopal@ Abhay Pratap v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC3 Jul 2023ABAIL/7376/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this criminal miscellaneous application for anticipatory bail, the Court observed that no strong case was made out for immediate interference. The application was disposed of with a direction to the applicant to surrender before the trial court within one month or file a regular bail application for consideration under the law laid down in Satender Kumar Antil.

What did the court decide?

Direction to surrender before the concerned court within one month; no coercive action for that period; regular bail application to be filed and decided later.

Gopal@ Abhay Pratap Vs State of U.P. and Another — Municipal and Town Planning | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:130083

¶2

Court No. - 72

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 7376 of 2023

¶4

Applicant :- Gopal@ Abhay Pratap Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Kuldeep Singh Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.

¶6

List has been revised.

¶7

Heard Sri Kuldeep Singh Yadav, learned counsel for applicant as well as Sri Sunil Kumar, learned Additional Government Advocate for State.

¶8

The present application for anticipatory bail has been filed for protection in regard to Case Crime No.105 of 2023, under Sections 341, 323, 326, 504 I.P.C., P.S. Surajpur, District Gautam Budh Nagar.

¶9

After arguing for some time, applicant's counsel submits that the present application for anticipatory bail may be disposed of with a direction to file a regular bail application which may be decided keeping in view the guidelines as laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in 2022 SCC OnLine SC 825 .

¶10

Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer of learned counsel for the applicant.

¶11

After hearing learned counsel for the parties, no case is made out for interference U/s 438 Cr.P.C. The present anticipatory bail application is disposed of with a direction that the applicant shall surrender before the concerned court below within one month from today and in case a regular bail application is filed, the same be decided in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra) .

¶12

For the period of one month from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant before the concerned court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant, in the above case.

¶13

[Krishan Pahal, J.]

¶14

Order Date :- 3.7.2023 Vikas

¶15

Digitally signed by :- VIKAS VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Gopal@ Abhay Pratap v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gopal@ Abhay Pratap v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ravindra Kumar Ojha Vs State of U.P.

Amjad Khan and Another Vs State of U.P.

Vikash Verma Vs State of U.P.

Deo Raj Gautam Vs State of U.P. and Another

Safeen Khan Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Ramjanam and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another