Criminal court allowed anticipatory bail application to Deo Raj Gautam in an FIR under Sections 420 and others IPC, relying on Sushila Aggarwal precedent and granting bail upon personal bond and conditions.
Anticipatory bail granted till conclusion of trial on personal bond with two sureties subject to standard conditions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:130603
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 13278 of 2022
Applicant :- Deo Raj Gautam Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ratnesh Mishra,Vikas Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
i. that the applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;
ii. that the applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence;
iii. that the applicant shall not leave India without previous permission of the court;
iv. that the applicant shall not tamper with the evidence during the trial; v. that the applicant shall not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness;
vi. that the applicant shall appear before the trial court on each date fixed unless personal presence is exempted;
(Justice Krishan Pahal)
Order Date :- 3.7.2023 Siddhant
Digitally signed by :- SIDDHANT SAHU High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the applicant given the apprehension of arrest and false implication allegations.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sushila Aggarwal Vs. State (NCT of Delhi)Relied on¶12
Sushila Aggarwal Vs. State (NCT of Delhi)-2020 SCC online SC 98 · Who else cites this
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Deo Raj Gautam
State of U.P.
Krishan Pahal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
