The High Court disposed of an application for anticipatory bail by directing the applicant to file a regular bail application under Satender Kumar Antil guidelines within one month. No coercive action was taken during this period.
Direction to file regular bail application within one month; no coercive action for that period.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:129876
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 4231 of 2023
Applicant :- Safeen Khan Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Irshad Ahmad Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Shahabuddin
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
(Justice Krishan Pahal)
Order Date :- 3.7.2023\Shalini
Digitally signed by :- SHALINI JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
3 issues framed by the court
Whether to allow the present anticipatory bail application or direct the filing of a regular bail application.
Whether to grant relief from coercive action for a specific period pending surrender.
Whether no case is made out for interference under S. 438 Cr.P.C. under the current circumstances.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and anotherReferred¶6
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, 2022 SCC Online SC 825 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Safeen Khan
State Of U.P.
Krishan Pahal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
