Anticipatory bail applicant argued false implication. High Court, without merits assessment, granted anticipatory bail with personal bond of Rs.50,000 and two sureties, citing standard conditions.
Applicant enlarged on anticipatory bail in a personal bond of Rs.50,000 with two sureties each in the like amount subject to specified conditions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:133048
Court No. - 71
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 6825 of 2023 Applicant :- Satyendra Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Raj Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.
granted to applicant shall also be taken care of as per the aforesaid judgment of the Apex Court.
(i) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer.
(ii) The applicant shall not leave the country during the currency of trial without prior permission from the concerned trial Court.
(iii) The applicant shall surrender his passport, if any, to the concerned Court forthwith. His passport will remain in custody of the concerned Court.
(iv) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence and the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law to ensure presence of the applicant.
(v) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail, the Court concerned may take appropriate action in accordance with law and judgment of Apex Court in the case of Sushila Aggarwal vs. State (NCT of Delhi)- 2020 SCC Online SC 98 .
(vi) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court default of this condition is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of his bail and proceed against his in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 6.7.2023
Ajeet
Digitally signed by :- AJEET KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the applicant under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in a case alleging cheating and criminal breach of trust.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sushila Aggarwal vs. State (NCT of Delhi)Referred¶9
_Sushila Aggarwal vs. State (NCT of Delhi)- 2020 SCC Online SC 98_ · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Satyendra Singh
State of U.P.
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
