Disposed

Rajneesh v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC5 Jul 2023ABAIL/5982/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Allahabad High Court disposed of an anticipatory bail application by directing the lower court to hear and decide the applicant's pending bail application expeditiously in accordance with the law laid down in Satender Kumar Antil, as the applicant requested the prayer for release be withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

The applicant's application was disposed of with a direction to the lower court to decide the pending bail application expeditiously.

Rajneesh Vs State of U.P. — Quashing and FIR | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:131859

¶2

Court No. - 71

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 5982 of 2023

¶4

Applicant :- Rajneesh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Shiv Kumar Kesari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Sachida Nand Tiwari

¶5

Hon'ble Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for applicant, learned A.G.A. for State and also perused the material available on record. Mr S. N. Tiwari, learned counsel for the informant is present.

¶7

The present IInd application for anticipatory bail has been filed for protection in regard to Case Crime No. 180 of 2022, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 IPC, P.S. Meja, District Prayagraj during the pendency of trial. The first anticipatory bail application has been dismissed for want of prosecution vide order dated 12.4.2023 passed in Criminal Misc Anticipatory Bail Application No. 13186 of 2022.

¶8

After arguing for some time, applicant's counsel submits that he does not want to press the prayer for release of the applicant on anticipatory bail. His sole prayer is that a direction may be issued to the court below to decide the bail application of the applicant in view of the judgement in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in 2021 SCC Online SC 922.

¶9

Learned A.G.A. as well as learned counsel for the informant have no objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the applicant.

¶10

In view of the above, considering the aforesaid alternative prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant, the present anticipatory bail application is disposed of with the direction that in case the applicant filed bail application before the court below, the same shall be heard and disposed of expeditiously by the court below in view of the settled law laid down by this court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra).

¶11

With the above observations and directions, this application is disposed of.

¶12

Order Date :- 5.7.2023 RavindraKSingh

¶13

Digitally signed by :- RAVINDRA KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Rajneesh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajneesh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Aditya Jain Vs State of U.P.

Smt Aliya Parveen Vs State of U.P. and Another

Mohd. Zakir Khan Vs State of U.P. and Another

Jagmohan Singh Vs State of U.P. and Another

Suraj Pal Vs State of U.P.and Another

Neeraj Soni Alias Neeraj Kumar Vs State of U.P. and Another