Virpal v. State of U.P through Prin. Sec. (Home) and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
No. - 2023:AHC:133746 Court No. - 71 Case :-…
No. - 2023:AHC:133746 Court No. - 71 Case :-…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:133746
Court No. - 71
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 6245 of 2023
Applicant :- Virpal Opposite Party :- State Of U.P Through Prin. Sec. (Home) And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Avnish Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.
Sri Avnish Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for applicant submits that the present anticipatory bail has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as such.
Accordingly, the present application is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 6.7.2023 Imtiyaz
Digitally signed by :- IMTIYAZ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Virpal
State Of U.P Through Prin. Sec. (Home) And 2 Others
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
Imtiyaz Ahmad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court