The Allahabad High Court disposed of an anticipatory bail application. The applicant withdrew the prayer for anticipatory bail and sought a direction for expeditious hearing of a bail application already pending in the lower court, citing guidelines from the Supreme Court.
Direction to court below to decide the pending bail application expeditiously.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:134074
Court No. - 71
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 6227 of 2023
Applicant :- Bablu Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Sati Shanker Tripathi,A.K. Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Garun Pal Singh
Hon'ble Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.
Order Date :- 7.7.2023/A.
Digitally signed by :- AFAQ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant required anticipatory bail or if the lower courts were directed to decide a pending bail application expeditiously following settled law.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and anotherReferred¶8
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, 2021 SCC Online SC 922 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bablu
State Of U.P.
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
