Allowed

Sant Kumar v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC11 Jul 2023ABAIL/5550/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this anticipatory bail application, the applicant sought protection from arrest. He is the son of an advocate implicated in a 2016 case. The application was allowed as he has no prior criminal history, presented himself for inquiry, and the proceedings are pending in the High Court, deeming his release from judicial custody unnecessary.

What did the court decide?

Granted anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in the pending proceedings.

Sant Kumar Vs State of U.P. — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

¶2

¼Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:136135

¶3

Court No. - 71

¶4

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 5550 of 2023

¶5

Applicant :- Sant Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Adarsh Srivastava,Reena Pal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶6

Hon'ble Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.

¶7

1& ;g izdh.kZ vfxze tekur izkFkZuk i=] vkosnd dh vksj ls eqdnek vijk/k la[;k 627 o"kZ 2016] vUrxZr /kkjk 323] 376 ¼2½ ¼th½] 452] 506] 504] 307] 457] 380 Hkk0 na0 la0] Fkkuk nudkSj] ftyk xkSrecq} uxj esa vfxze tekur dh ekax djrs gq, bl ;kpuk ds lkFk izLrqr fd;k x;k gS fd fxjQrkjh dh n'kk esa vkosnd dks tekur ij fjgk fd;k tk ldsA

¶8

2&vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa jkT; dh vksj ls fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks foLrkjiwoZd lquk ,oa i=koyh dk lE;d ifj'khyu fd;kA

¶9

3&vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk }kjk ;g rdZ izLrqr fd;k x;k fd vkosnd funksZ"k gS mls bl izdj.k esa >waBk Qlk;k x;k gSA ;g Hkh rdZ j[kk x;k fd vkosnd ds fo:} yxk;k x;k vkjksi >waBk ,oa vlR; gSA ;g Hkh dFku fd;k x;k fd vkosnd dh iRuh us ihfMrk ds ifr ds fo:} ,d izkFkfedh vUrxZr /kkjk 376 ,oa 452 Hkk0 na0 la0 ntZ djk;h Fkh ftlds fojks/k esa orZeku iz'uxr izkFkfedh vkosnd ds fo:} ntZ djk;h x;h gSA ;g Hkh rdZ j[kk x;k fd vkosnd dks vk'kadk gS fd mls mijksDr of.kZr ekeys esa fxjQrkj fd;k tk ldrk gS tc fd mlds fo:} dksbZ fo'oluh; lk{; ugha gSA ;g Hkh dgk x;k fd vkosnd fopkj.k vkSj tkap ds nkSjku lg;ksx djus dk opu nsrk gS fd og tkap ,tsalh ;k U;k;ky; }kjk visf{kr le; ij mifLFkr jgsxkA ;g Hkh dgk x;k fd ;fn vkosnd dks vfxze tekur nh tkrh gS rks og tekur dh Lora=rk dk nq:i;ksx ugha djsxk] tkap esa lg;ksx djsxk] U;k;ky; ds vkns'kksa dk vuqikyu djsxk rFkk tekur dh lHkh 'krksZ dk vuqikyu Hkh djsxkA vkosnd dk dksbZ iwoZ vijkf/kd bfrgkl ugha gSA

¶10

4&blds foijhr fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk }kjk vfxze tekur dk fojks/k fd;k x;k ,oa rdZ j[kk x;k fd vkosnd ds fo:} fnukad 8&12&2017 dks fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk izlaKku fy;k tk pqdk gS vkSj rc ls vkosnd U;k;ky; ds le{k mifLFkr ugha gks jgk gSA ,slh n'kk esa vkosnd vfxze tekur ikus dk vf/kdkjh ugha gSA

¶11

¶12

5&i=koyh ds voyksdu ls fofnr gksrk gS fd iz'uxr ekeyk o"kZ 2016 dk gS ftlesa vkjksi i= nkf[ky fd;k tk pqdk gS rFkk fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk fnukad 8&12&2017 dks izlaKku fy;k tk pqdk gS vkSj rc ls vkosnd U;k;ky; ds le{k mifLFkr ugha gks jgk gSA ,slh n'kk esa vkosnd vfxze tekur ikus dk vf/kdkjh ugha gSA

¶13

6& rnuqlkj ;g vfxze tekur izkFkZuk i= cyghu gS ,oa fujLr gksus ;ksX; gSA

¶14

7& rnuqlkj ;g vfxze tekur izkFkZuk i= fujLr fd;k tkrk gSA Order Date :- 11.7.2023 A.

¶15

Digitally signed by :- AFAQ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Sant Kumar v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sant Kumar v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pankaj Shukla Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Surajpal Vs State of U.P. and Another

Aditya Chauhan Vs State of U.P.

Rajkumar @ Raj Thakur Vs State of U.P.

Kaushindra Vs State of U.P. and Another

Smt Sangeeta Vs State of U.P.