The applicant withdrew the prayer for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. The court disposed of the application by directing the lower court to decide the pending regular bail application expeditiously, relying on Supreme Court precedent.
Direction to the court below to decide the applicant's pending bail application expeditiously.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:135236
Court No. - 71
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 6517 of 2023
Applicant :- Aditya Chauhan Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Saurabh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.
Order Date :- 10.7.2023/A.
Digitally signed by :- AFAQ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow the applicant to withdraw the anticipatory bail prayer and instead seek directions for expeditious hearing of his regular bail?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and anotherReferred¶8
2021 SCC Online SC 922 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Aditya Chauhan
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
