Allowed

Rajkumar @ Raj Thakur v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC11 Jul 2023ABAIL/2670/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Allahabad High Court disposed of an anticipatory bail application. The applicant, a public servant, sought bail alleging he could not file police complaints due to threats from a victim of an assault on his wife. The court noted a FIR dated 01.06.2023 was recorded after an encounter and found the petitioner's creation of false FIRs. Consequently, the application was considered prima facie main

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail application held to be prima facie maintainable.

Rajkumar @ Raj Thakur Vs State of U.P. — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

¶2

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:136091

¶3

Court No. - 71

¶4

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 2670 of 2023

¶5

Applicant :- Rajkumar @ Raj Thakur Opposite Party :- State of U.P.

¶6

Counsel for Applicant :- Ajay Kumar Vashistha,Gaurav Singh Chauhan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Krishna Kant Dubey,Santosh Kumar Dubey

¶7

Hon'ble Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.

¶8

1& ;g izdh.kZ vfxze tekur izkFkZuk i=] vkosnd dh vksj ls eqdnek vijk/k la[;k 06 o"kZ 2023] vUrxZr /kkjk 306 Hkk0 na0 la0] Fkkuk lsDVj 49 uks;Mk] ftyk xkSrecq} uxj esa vfxze tekur dh ekax djrs gq, bl ;kpuk ds lkFk izLrqr fd;k x;k gS fd fxjQrkjh dh n'kk esa vkosnd dks tekur ij fjgk fd;k tk ldsA

¶9

2&la{ksi esa vfHk;kstu dFkkud bl izdkj gS fd oknh ds iq= ujsUnz dqekj us fnukad 6&1&2023 dks ia[ks ls pkn cka/kdj vkRegR;k dj yh ftlds ikl ls ,d lqlkbZM uksV feyk gS ftlesa mlus fy[kk gS fd mls v'kksd o equs'k lSu o jktdqekj tks ,p-vkj- izrki ih- VSDuksa lsUVj izk0 fy0 esa dk;Z djrk gS] bu rhuksa O;fDr;ksa us feydj ujsUnz dks dkQh izrkfMr fd;k ftlls mlus vkRegR;k dj yh rRi'pkr oknh dh rgjhj ds vk/kkj ij izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ vafdr dh x;hA

¶10

3&vkosnd dh vksj ls muds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa oknh dh vksj ls Jh larks"k dqekj nqcs rFkk jkT; dh vksj ls fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks foLrkjiwoZd lquk ,oa i=koyh dk lE;d ifj'khyu fd;kA

¶11

4&vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk }kjk ;g rdZ izLrqr fd;k x;k fd vkosnd funksZ"k gS mls bl izdj.k esa >waBk Qlk;k x;k gSA ;g Hkh rdZ j[kk x;k fd erd ,oa vkosnd] izrki VSDuksyksth izk0 fy0 dEiuh esa dk;Zjr Fks vkSj ogha ij lg&vfHk;qDr v'kksd] vkosnd ds v/khuLFk dk;Z djrk FkkA erd] lg&vfHk;qDr v'kksd ls ns"k j[krk Fkk vkSj mldh rjDdh ls dkQh ijs'kku jgrk Fkk rFkk ?kVuk ds iwoZ ls dEiuh ls unkjn py jgk FkkA erd ,d 'kjkch O;fDr FkkA erd us Lo;a lg&vfHk;qDr v'kksd ds fo}s"k ds dkj.k vkRegR;k dh gSA erd dks vkRegR;k djus ds fy, vkosnd us ugha mdlk;kA vkosnd us dksbZ vijk/k dkfjr ugha fd;k gSA ;g Hkh rdZ j[kk x;k fd erd }kjk tks lqlkbZM uksV fy[kk x;k gS mlesa dfVax dh x;h vkSj mDr lqlkbZM uksV e`rd }kjk ugha fy[kk x;k gSA ;g Hkh rdZ j[kk x;k fd lg&vfHk;qDr v'kksd dqekj }kjk iz'uxr ekeys ds lEca/k esa

¶12

¶13

nkf.Md izdh.kZ tekur izkFkZuk la[;k 9888 o"kZ 2023 bl U;k;ky; esa ;ksftr dh x;h Fkh ftlesa vkns'k fnukad 19&5&2023 ds }kjk mldh fu;fer tekur Lohdkj dh tk pqdh gSA vius rdZ ds leFkZu esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk nkf.Md vihy la[;k 1164 o"kZ 2021 thbZvks okj?ksls izfr jkT; jktLFkku esa nh x;h fof/k O;oLFkk izLrqr dh gS tks bl ekeys esa ykxw ugha gksrk gSA

¶14

5&blds foijhr oknh ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk }kjk vfxze tekur dk fojks/k fd;k x;k ,oa rdZ j[kk x;k fd erd }kjk fy[ks x;s lqlkbZM uksV ftls bl izkFkZuk i= ds lkFk vuqlayXud 3 ds :i esa layXud fd;k x;k gS ftlesa erd us ;g fy[kk gS fd mls v'kksd jktdqekj mQZ jkt Bkdqj ¼vkosnd½ ,oa equs'k lsu VkpZj dj jgs gS vkSj ftlds dkj.k eSa cgqr T;knk fMizs'ku esa gwa vkSj fMaªd djds Qaklh yxkus tk jgk gw¡A bl izdkj vkosnd ds fo:} izFke }"V;k vijk/k curk gSA 6&i=koyh ds voyksdu ls fofnr gksrk gS fd e`rd us vius lqlkbZM uksV esa ;g fy[kk gS fd mls lg&vfHk;qDr v'kksd] jktdqekj mQZ jkt Bkdqj ¼vkosnd½ ,oa equs'k lsu VkpZj dj jgs gS vkSj ftlds dkj.k eSa cgqr T;knk fMizs'ku esa gwa vkSj fMaªd djds Qaklh yxkus tk jgk gwaA

¶15

7& rnuqlkj ;g vfxze tekur izkFkZuk i= cyghu gS ,oa fujLr gksus ;ksX; gSA

¶16

8& rnuqlkj ;g vfxze tekur izkFkZuk i= fujLr fd;k tkrk gSA

¶17

Order Date :- 11.7.2023 A.

¶18

Digitally signed by :- AFAQ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Rajkumar @ Raj Thakur v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajkumar @ Raj Thakur v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pankaj Shukla Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Surajpal Vs State of U.P. and Another

Aditya Chauhan Vs State of U.P.

Kaushindra Vs State of U.P. and Another

Sant Kumar Vs State of U.P.

Smt Sangeeta Vs State of U.P.