Single judge observed that the applicant withdrew anticipatory bail prayer but sought a direction for speedy disposal of his pending bail application relying on Superior Court law, granting the direction instead of anticipatory bail.
Application disposed of with direction to court below to hear and dispose of bail application expeditiously.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:231741
Court No. - 71
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 13517 of 2023
Applicant :- Mohammad Mahmood Akhtar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ambreen Masroor,Sadrul Islam Jafri,Sr. Advocate Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Matiur Rehman Khan,Saqib Ahmad
Hon'ble Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.
Order Date :- 7.12.2023/A.
Digitally signed by :- AFAQ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
3 issues framed by the court
Whether directions should be issued to the court below to decide the bail application expeditiously in light of settled law.
Whether the applicant is entitled to a direction for speedy disposal of pending bail application.
Whether anticipatory bail prayer needs to be pressed or if procedural direction suffices.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and anotherFollowed¶7
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, 2021 SCC Online SC 922 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mohammad Mahmood Akhtar
State of U.P.
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
